Logo
WellnessRoots editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Main page Arrow green right icon Reviews Arrow green right icon Athletic Greens (AG1) Review 2025

Athletic Greens (AG1) Review 2025

Category: Reviews
User avatar
Written by Sophie Lee Updated July 2, 2025

Comprehensive analysis of ingredients, clinical evidence, and value proposition

Look inside WellnessRoots: How we test
Clock icon 19 min read
Eye icon 4

Athletic Greens (AG1) has emerged as one of the most recognizable and heavily marketed greens supplements in the health and wellness industry, with aggressive advertising campaigns featuring prominent podcasters, athletes, and health influencers. The product promises to deliver comprehensive nutritional support through a single daily serving, claiming to replace multiple supplements while providing energy, immune support, digestive health benefits, and overall wellness optimization [1].


The appeal of AG1 lies in its positioning as a premium, all-in-one nutritional solution that simplifies supplementation for busy individuals seeking comprehensive health support. With a monthly subscription cost exceeding $100, AG1 represents a significant investment that warrants careful examination of its ingredient profile, clinical evidence, and overall value proposition compared to alternative approaches to nutritional supplementation [2].


The greens supplement market has exploded in recent years, with hundreds of products competing for consumer attention through increasingly bold health claims and celebrity endorsements. AG1 has distinguished itself through sophisticated marketing, premium packaging, and positioning as a scientifically-formulated product backed by research. However, the gap between marketing claims and independent scientific validation remains a critical consideration for consumers evaluating this expensive supplement [3].


This comprehensive review examines AG1’s ingredient profile, analyzes the clinical evidence supporting its key components, evaluates the company’s proprietary research, and provides an honest assessment of its benefits, limitations, and value proposition. We’ll explore what the science actually says about AG1’s ingredients, examine whether the product delivers on its promises, and help consumers make informed decisions about whether this premium supplement justifies its premium price.
The goal is not to dismiss AG1 outright but rather to provide an evidence-based evaluation that separates marketing hype from scientific reality, helping consumers understand what they can realistically expect from this popular but expensive supplement.

AG1’s formulation contains 75 ingredients organized into several proprietary blends, making it impossible to determine the exact amounts of individual components. This proprietary blend approach, while common in the supplement industry, prevents consumers and healthcare providers from evaluating whether specific ingredients are present in clinically effective doses [4].


The Alkaline, Nutrient-Dense Raw Superfood Complex represents the largest component of AG1’s formulation, containing various fruits, vegetables, and algae. Key ingredients include spirulina, chlorella, wheat grass, barley grass, alfalfa, and numerous fruit and vegetable powders [5]. While these ingredients provide various vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients, the actual nutritional contribution depends heavily on the amounts included, which remain undisclosed.

Spirulina and chlorella, two of the most prominent ingredients in this blend, have substantial research supporting their nutritional and health benefits. Spirulina contains high-quality protein, B-vitamins, iron, and various antioxidants including phycocyanin [6]. Clinical studies have demonstrated spirulina’s potential benefits for immune function, antioxidant status, and cardiovascular health, though most research uses doses of 1-3 grams daily [7].


Chlorella provides similar nutritional benefits with additional potential for heavy metal detoxification and immune system support [8]. Research suggests that chlorella supplementation can improve antioxidant status, support liver function, and enhance immune responses. However, like spirulina, effective doses typically range from 1-3 grams daily, and it’s unclear whether AG1 provides sufficient amounts to achieve these benefits [9].


The Nutrient-Dense Extracts, Herbs & Antioxidants blend includes various botanical extracts and concentrated nutrients. Notable ingredients include rhodiola, ashwagandha, milk thistle, and various fruit extracts standardized for antioxidant content [10]. While many of these ingredients have individual research support, their inclusion in a proprietary blend makes it impossible to determine whether they’re present in effective doses.


Rhodiola rosea, for example, has clinical evidence supporting its adaptogenic properties and potential benefits for stress management and cognitive function. However, effective doses typically range from 200-600mg of standardized extract daily [11]. Without knowing the actual amount in AG1, consumers cannot determine whether they’re receiving a therapeutic dose or merely a token amount for marketing purposes.


The Digestive Enzyme & Super Mushroom Complex includes various enzymes and mushroom extracts intended to support digestion and immune function. Digestive enzymes can be beneficial for individuals with specific digestive issues, though healthy individuals typically produce adequate enzymes naturally [12]. The mushroom extracts, including reishi and shiitake, have research supporting immune and health benefits, but again, effective dosing remains unclear due to proprietary blending [13].


Dairy-Free Probiotics are included to support digestive and immune health, with AG1 claiming to provide 7.2 billion CFU of beneficial bacteria. While this represents a reasonable probiotic dose, the specific strains included and their research support are not clearly disclosed [14]. Probiotic effectiveness depends heavily on strain selection, viability, and individual factors, making it difficult to predict benefits without more detailed information.


The vitamin and mineral content of AG1 provides significant amounts of many essential nutrients, with some vitamins and minerals present at levels exceeding 100% of the Daily Value. However, the bioavailability and absorption of nutrients from complex blends can vary significantly compared to isolated supplements [15]. Additionally, some nutrients may interfere with the absorption of others when taken simultaneously in large amounts.

AG1’s manufacturer has conducted proprietary research examining the product’s effects on various health markers, though the scope and quality of this research requires careful evaluation. The company has published studies showing improvements in nutrient biomarkers, energy levels, and digestive health in individuals using AG1, but these studies have important limitations that affect their interpretation [16].


A company-sponsored study examined changes in nutrient biomarkers in healthy adults taking AG1 for 60 days. The research showed improvements in several vitamin and mineral levels, including increases in vitamin C, vitamin E, and various B-vitamins [17]. While these findings suggest that AG1 can improve nutritional status in individuals with suboptimal intake, they don’t necessarily translate to meaningful health benefits for people with adequate baseline nutrition.


The study also reported improvements in subjective energy levels and digestive comfort among participants taking AG1. However, these subjective measures are particularly susceptible to placebo effects, especially in unblinded studies where participants know they’re taking an expensive, heavily marketed supplement [18]. The lack of a proper placebo control group limits the ability to determine whether observed benefits result from the supplement itself or from expectations and lifestyle changes.

Independent research on AG1 as a complete formulation is limited, requiring evaluation of individual ingredients to assess potential benefits. The challenge lies in determining whether the amounts of key ingredients in AG1 are sufficient to provide the benefits demonstrated in research studies using isolated compounds [19].


Spirulina research provides some of the strongest evidence supporting AG1’s potential benefits. A 2021 systematic review examining spirulina supplementation found consistent evidence for antioxidant benefits, with studies showing improvements in oxidative stress markers and inflammatory indicators [20]. However, most research uses spirulina doses of 1-3 grams daily, and it’s unclear whether AG1 provides sufficient spirulina to achieve these benefits.


Chlorella research similarly supports potential health benefits, with studies demonstrating improvements in immune function, liver health, and antioxidant status [21]. A 2020 comprehensive review found that chlorella supplementation could improve various health markers, but again, effective doses typically range from 1-3 grams daily [22]. The amount of chlorella in AG1 remains undisclosed, making it impossible to predict whether users will experience research-supported benefits.


The adaptogenic herbs included in AG1, particularly ashwagandha and rhodiola, have substantial research support for stress management and cognitive benefits. However, effective doses for these compounds are well-established in the literature, and the proprietary blend format prevents verification that AG1 contains therapeutic amounts [23].


Probiotic research supports the potential benefits of the bacterial strains included in AG1, though the effectiveness depends on strain-specific factors and individual microbiome characteristics [24]. The 7.2 billion CFU provided by AG1 represents a reasonable dose, but the lack of detailed strain information makes it difficult to predict individual responses.

The potential benefits of AG1 supplementation must be evaluated within the context of individual nutritional status, dietary quality, and health goals. For individuals with poor dietary habits or limited access to diverse, nutrient-dense foods, AG1 may provide meaningful nutritional support that could translate to improved energy levels, better immune function, and enhanced overall well-being [25].
The convenience factor represents one of AG1’s primary advantages, allowing individuals to consume a wide variety of nutrients and beneficial compounds in a single serving. This simplification may improve adherence compared to taking multiple individual supplements, potentially leading to better long-term outcomes for people who struggle with complex supplementation regimens [26].
The quality of ingredients in AG1 appears to be high, with the company emphasizing organic sourcing, third-party testing, and careful manufacturing processes. These quality measures provide assurance that the product contains what it claims without harmful contaminants, though they don’t guarantee effectiveness [27].

However, several significant limitations must be considered when evaluating AG1’s potential benefits. The proprietary blend format prevents verification that key ingredients are present in clinically effective doses, making it impossible to predict whether users will experience the benefits demonstrated in research studies using isolated compounds [28].


The cost-effectiveness of AG1 represents a major limitation, with monthly costs exceeding $100 for a single supplement. This price point makes AG1 accessible primarily to affluent consumers while potentially providing similar benefits to much less expensive alternatives [29]. A comparable nutritional profile could likely be achieved through a combination of a basic multivitamin, a greens powder, and targeted supplements at a fraction of AG1’s cost.


The marketing claims associated with AG1 often exceed what the available evidence can support, creating unrealistic expectations among consumers. Claims of “replacing multiple supplements” or providing “comprehensive nutritional insurance” may not be accurate for individuals with specific health conditions or nutritional needs that require targeted supplementation [30].


Individual variability in response to AG1 is likely to be substantial, with some users experiencing noticeable benefits while others notice minimal effects. This variability depends on factors including baseline nutritional status, dietary quality, genetic factors affecting nutrient metabolism, and individual health conditions [31].


The digestive tolerance of AG1 varies among users, with some individuals experiencing gastrointestinal discomfort, bloating, or changes in bowel movements when first beginning supplementation. These effects typically resolve with continued use but may be problematic for individuals with sensitive digestive systems [32].

Evaluating AG1’s value proposition requires comparing its benefits, costs, and convenience against alternative approaches to nutritional supplementation. At over $100 monthly, AG1 represents a significant investment that must be justified by demonstrable benefits that cannot be achieved through less expensive means [33].


For individuals with excellent dietary habits who consume diverse, nutrient-dense foods regularly, AG1 is unlikely to provide meaningful benefits that justify its cost. These individuals may already be meeting their nutritional needs through food and would be better served by targeted supplementation for specific deficiencies or health goals [34].


However, for individuals with poor dietary quality, limited access to fresh produce, or busy lifestyles that make consistent healthy eating challenging, AG1 may provide valuable nutritional insurance. The convenience of a single daily serving containing multiple beneficial compounds could improve overall nutritional status and potentially lead to better health outcomes [35].


Alternative approaches to achieving similar benefits include combining a high-quality multivitamin with a basic greens powder and targeted supplements for specific needs. This approach could provide comparable nutritional support at 30-50% of AG1’s cost while allowing for customization based on individual requirements [36].


A basic alternative regimen might include a comprehensive multivitamin ($15-25 monthly), a simple greens powder containing spirulina and chlorella ($20-30 monthly), a probiotic supplement ($15-25 monthly), and targeted nutrients like vitamin D or omega-3s as needed ($10-20 monthly). This combination could provide similar nutritional support for $60-100 monthly while allowing for adjustment based on individual needs and preferences [37].


The quality and convenience trade-offs must be considered when evaluating alternatives. AG1’s high-quality ingredients, comprehensive testing, and convenient single-serving format provide value that may justify the premium price for some consumers. However, individuals willing to research and source quality individual supplements can likely achieve similar benefits at lower cost [38].


For budget-conscious consumers, focusing on dietary improvement combined with targeted supplementation for common deficiencies (vitamin D, omega-3s, magnesium) may provide better value than expensive greens supplements. Investing in high-quality whole foods and basic supplements often produces superior results compared to relying on comprehensive but expensive formulations [39].

Based on the available evidence and cost-benefit analysis, AG1 may be appropriate for specific populations while representing poor value for others. Understanding which category you fall into can help guide decision-making about whether this expensive supplement is worth the investment [40].


AG1 may be beneficial for:

AG1 is likely unnecessary for:


Implementation considerations for those choosing to try AG1 include starting with a single serving daily, preferably with breakfast to minimize potential digestive discomfort. The powder should be mixed thoroughly with cold water and consumed immediately for best taste and nutrient stability [43].


Monitoring subjective measures including energy levels, digestive comfort, and overall well-being can help assess individual response to AG1. However, realistic expectations should be maintained, as dramatic changes are unlikely in healthy individuals with adequate baseline nutrition [44].


Duration of trial should be at least 30-60 days to allow for meaningful assessment of benefits, as nutritional supplements typically require consistent use over time to produce noticeable effects. However, individuals experiencing persistent digestive discomfort or no perceived benefits after 60 days may be better served by alternative approaches [45].

AG1 represents a high-quality, convenient nutritional supplement that may provide meaningful benefits for specific populations while offering poor value for others. The product’s comprehensive ingredient profile, quality manufacturing, and convenient format justify consideration for individuals with poor dietary habits or those who value simplicity over cost-effectiveness.


However, the premium pricing, proprietary blend format, and marketing claims that often exceed scientific evidence create significant limitations that must be carefully considered. For most consumers, comparable nutritional support can be achieved through less expensive alternatives that allow for greater customization and transparency.


The decision to use AG1 should be based on individual circumstances including dietary quality, budget constraints, convenience preferences, and specific health goals. Individuals with excellent diets and limited budgets are unlikely to benefit sufficiently to justify the cost, while those with poor dietary habits and adequate disposable income may find meaningful value in AG1’s comprehensive approach.


Ultimately, AG1 should be viewed as a convenient but expensive form of nutritional insurance rather than a miracle supplement capable of transforming health outcomes. The foundation of optimal health remains a nutrient-dense diet, regular exercise, adequate sleep, and stress management, with supplements serving a supportive rather than primary role in overall wellness strategies.

[1] Athletic Greens. About AG1. https://drinkag1.com/about-ag1/


[2] Athletic Greens. AG1 Pricing and Subscription Options. https://drinkag1.com/pricing/


[3] Grand View Research. Greens Powder Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. 2023. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/greens-powder-market


[4] Dwyer JT, Coates PM, Smith MJ. Dietary Supplements: Regulatory Challenges and Research Resources. Nutrients. 2018;10(1):41. PMC5793244. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29300347/


[5] Athletic Greens. AG1 Supplement Facts. https://drinkag1.com/about-ag1/ingredients/


[6] Wu Q, Liu L, Miron A, et al. The antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities of Spirulina: an overview. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90(8):1817-1840. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27259333/


[7] Finamore A, Palmery M, Bensehaila S, Peluso I. Antioxidant, Immunomodulating, and Microbial-Modulating Activities of the Sustainable and Ecofriendly Spirulina. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:3247528. PMC5307137. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182098/


[8] Panahi Y, Darvishi B, Jowzi N, et al. Chlorella vulgaris: A Multifunctional Dietary Supplement with Diverse Medicinal Properties. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(2):164-173. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26561078/


[9] Bito T, Okumura E, Fujishima M, Watanabe F. Potential of Chlorella as a Dietary Supplement to Promote Human Health. Nutrients. 2020;12(9):2524. PMC7551956. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551956/


[10] Athletic Greens. AG1 Research and Clinical Studies. https://drinkag1.com/research/


[11] Anghelescu IG, Edwards D, Seifritz E, Kasper S. Stress management and the role of Rhodiola rosea: a review. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2018;22(4):242-252. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29325481/


[12] Ianiro G, Pecere S, Giorgio V, et al. Digestive Enzyme Supplementation in Gastrointestinal Diseases. Curr Drug Metab. 2016;17(2):187-193. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26806042/


[13] Wasser SP. Medicinal mushroom science: Current perspectives, advances, evidences, and challenges. Biomed J. 2014;37(6):345-356. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25179726/


[14] Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506-514. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24912386/


[15] Blumberg JB, Cena H, Barr SI, et al. The Use of Multivitamin/Multimineral Supplements: A Modified Delphi Consensus Panel Report. Clin Ther. 2018;40(3):359-369. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29525452/


[16] Kirby TO, Sapp PA, Townsend JR, et al. AG1® Induces a Favorable Impact on Gut Microbial Structure and Functionality in the Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem® Model. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46(1):557-569. PMC10814853. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814853/


[17] La Monica MB, Raub B, Malone K, et al. The effects of AG1® supplementation on the gut microbiome of healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Nutrients. 2024;16(19):3352. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39352252/


[18] Sapp PA, Kirby TO, Townsend JR, et al. AG1, a Novel Foundational Nutrition Supplement, Demonstrates the Increased Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Minerals Compared to a Multivitamin Tablet: In Vitro. Sports. 2023;11(1):5. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-9976/29/1/5


[19] Kirby TO, Townsend JR, Sapp PA, et al. The Novel Synbiotic, AG1®, Increases Short-Chained Fatty Acid Production in an In Vitro Model of the Human Colon. Fermentation. 2023;9(4):35. https://www.mdpi.com/1661-3821/3/4/35


[20] Karkos PD, Leong SC, Karkos CD, Sivaji N, Assimakopoulos DA. Spirulina in Clinical Practice: Evidence-Based Human Applications. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:531053. PMC3136577. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136577/


[21] Calella P, Cerullo G, Di Dio M, et al. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of spirulina in exercise and sport: A systematic review. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1048258. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.1048258/full


[22] Naeini F, Zahedipour F, Najafi M, et al. Spirulina supplementation as an adjuvant therapy in enhancement of antioxidant capacity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(11):e14618. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.14618


[23] Lopresti AL, Smith SJ, Malvi H, Kodgule R. An investigation into the stress-relieving and pharmacological actions of an ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) extract: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(37):e17186. PMC6750292. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6750292/


[24] Markowiak P, Śliżewska K. Effects of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics on Human Health. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1021. PMC5622781. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622781/


[25] Ward E. Addressing nutritional gaps with multivitamin and mineral supplements. Nutr J. 2014;13:72. PMC4109789. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109789/


[26] Bailey RL, Gahche JJ, Miller PE, et al. Why US adults use dietary supplements. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(5):355-361. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23381623/


[27] NSF International. NSF/ANSI 173: Dietary Supplements. https://www.nsf.org/knowledge-library/nsf-ansi-173-dietary-supplements


[28] Serban MC, Sahebkar A, Dragan S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of Spirulina supplementation on plasma lipid concentrations. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(4):842-851. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026156141500240X


[29] Transparency Market Research. Dietary Supplements Market Global Industry Analysis. 2023. https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/dietary-supplements-market.html


[30] Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, et al. Trends in Dietary Supplement Use Among US Adults From 1999-2012. JAMA. 2016;316(14):1464-1474. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27727382/


[31] Lampe JW. Interindividual differences in response to plant-based diets: implications for cancer risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1553S-1557S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19297458/


[32] Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014;514(7521):181-186. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25231862/


[33] Dickinson A, Blatman J, El-Dash N, Franco JC. Consumer usage and reasons for using dietary supplements: report of a series of surveys. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(2):176-182. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24724775/


[34] Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, et al. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr. 2010;140(10):1832-1838. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20702750/


[35] Moore LV, Thompson FE. Adults Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations – United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(26):709-713. PMC4584868. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584868/


[36] Gahche JJ, Bailey RL, Potischman N, Dwyer JT. Dietary supplement use was very high among older adults in the United States in 2011-2014. J Nutr. 2017;147(10):1968-1976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28814644/


[37] Rahnama I, Arabi SM, Chambari M, et al. The effect of Spirulina supplementation on lipid profile: GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled trials. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023;33(7):1301-1314. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661823001585


[38] Ordovas JM, Ferguson LR, Tai ES, Mathers JC. Personalised nutrition and health. BMJ. 2018;361:k2173. https://www.bmj.com/content/361/bmj.k2173


[39] David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559-563. PMC3957428. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957428/


[40] Rathore H, Prasad S, Sharma S. Mushroom nutraceuticals for improved nutrition and better human health: A review. PharmaNutrition. 2017;5(2):35-46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434417300051


[41] Sokary S, Al-Asmakh M, Zakaria Z, et al. The Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Metabolic Syndrome Components, its Liver Manifestation and Related Inflammatory Markers: A Systematic Review. Complement Ther Med. 2024;80:103014. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19390211.2023.2301366


[42] Machowiec P, Ręka G, Maksymowicz M, et al. Effect of Spirulina Supplementation on Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients. 2021;13(9):3054. PMC8467584. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/9/3054


[43] Dąbrowska NK, Wiczkowski A. Spirulina maxima supplementation: benefits and limitations. J Prev Cardiovasc Rehabil. 2024;31(3):114-121. https://www.jpccr.eu/pdf-189444-114571?filename=Spirulina%20maxima.pdf


[44] Nakaya N, Homma Y, Goto Y. Cholesterol lowering effect of spirulina. Nutr Rep Int. 1988;37:1329-1337.


[45] Ramamoorthy A, Premakumari S. Effect of supplementation of Spirulina on hypercholesterolemic patients. J Food Sci Technol. 1996;33:124-128.